Course Overview & Logistical Details
Price: Competitive package pricing tailored for efficient CME budget utilization.
Duration of Access: Comprehensive lifetime or multi-cycle access to support your ongoing recertification requirements.
Deliverables: Thousands of high-yield practice questions, detailed rationales, and structured review materials aligned with the NCCPA Blueprint.
Accreditation: The panre review course offers 100 hours of AAPA Category 1 credit.
When you are preparing for recertification, maximizing your professional development funds is just as important as mastering the clinical content. Through CME Review Courses, PAs can access rigorous study materials while optimizing their allowance using our popular cme gift cards add-on options.
When purchasing your preparation materials, whether you are looking into our flagship panre review course or specialized pance prep courses, you have the flexibility to select Amazon and Apple Gift Card add-ons ranging from $100 to $1,500. Please note that these gift card add-ons are paid add-ons included with your educational purchase and are NOT free gifts. They provide an efficient, transparent mechanism to utilize your remaining employer CME funds toward technology, literature, or personal professional tools that further enrich your education.
PANRE-LA vs Traditional PANRE: The Core Differences
Deciding between the Longitudinal Assessment (PANRE-LA) and the traditional, proctored PANRE is one of the most critical choices physician assistants face during their 10-year recertification cycle. Both exams rely on the same foundational NCCPA Blueprint, but their delivery, scoring mechanics, and logistical burdens differ significantly.
Traditional PANRE
- Format: A single, high-stakes, closed-book exam consisting of 240 multiple-choice questions administered over four 60-minute blocks at a Pearson VUE test center.
- Timing: Taken during years 9 or 10 of your 10-year cycle.
- Scoring: Scored on a traditional scaled score from 200 to 800, with 379 required to pass.
- Retakes: Up to three total attempts allowed within the window, with a mandatory 90-day waiting period between tests.
PANRE-LA
- Format: An at-home, open-book longitudinal assessment delivered via the NCCPA portal. Participants answer 25 multiple-choice questions per quarter over at least 8 and up to 12 quarters (spanning years 7 through 9).
- Timing: Enrollment must be initiated in year 6 of your recertification cycle.
- Scoring: Cumulative scoring system on a scale of 1000 to 1500, requiring a minimum cumulative score of 1150 across your best 8 quarters.
- CME Benefit: PANRE-LA grants 2 Category 1 CME credits per completed quarter directly from the NCCPA, though this is separate from the comprehensive 100 hours of AAPA Category 1 credit earned through dedicated preparatory packages like our panre review course.
Common Mistakes in PANRE Review
Many PAs encounter unnecessary hurdles during recertification due to avoidable missteps:
- Delaying Preparation Until Year 10: Waiting until the final year creates acute stress, whether you are cramming for the traditional PANRE or rushing to meet quarterly deadlines in PANRE-LA.
- Ignoring the NCCPA Blueprint: Studying outdated or broad textbooks instead of focusing strictly on the official content distribution leads to wasted study hours.
- Failing to Track CME Allowances: Not pairing exam preparation with structured CME packages means leaving hundreds of dollars in employer-provided CME funds on the table at year-end.
Facts About AAPA Category 1 Credit
Navigating continuing medical education requirements requires strict adherence to accreditation standards:
- The panre review course provides 100 hours of AAPA Category 1 credit, satisfying major state and national recertification benchmarks.
- While nurse practitioners and physicians also utilize our comprehensive materials, AAPA Category 1 credit applicability varies by state board for NPs, and physicians typically claim these hours as Category 2 credit. Always verify your specific state licensing board guidelines.
Clinical Practice Assessment
Your patient is a 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus who presents to the emergency department with sudden-onset, tearing chest pain radiating to the back. His blood pressure is 180/100 mmHg in the right arm and 140/85 mmHg in the left arm. Heart rate is 95 bpm, and respiratory rate is 22 breaths/min. A diastolic decrescendo murmur is heard along the left sternal border. An immediate bedside ECG shows normal sinus rhythm with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Which of the following is the most appropriate initial imaging modality to confirm the diagnosis?
A) Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
B) Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest with IV contrast
C) Chest radiography (CXR)
D) Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the chest
Answer and Clinical Justification
Correct Answer: B) Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest with IV contrast
Explanation:
CTA of the chest with IV contrast is the imaging modality of choice for suspected aortic dissection in hemodynamically stable patients, offering high sensitivity and specificity (>95%) to visualize the intimal flap and true/false lumens. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) has lower sensitivity for the descending aorta and is often used rapidly at the bedside only if the patient is unstable. Chest radiography (CXR) may show a widened mediastinum, but it lacks the diagnostic accuracy required to rule out or confirm aortic dissection definitively and should not delay definitive cross-sectional imaging. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is highly accurate but is time-consuming, less accessible in emergency settings, and unsuitable for unstable patients.
Pragmatic clinical note: In suspected acute aortic dissection, time to diagnosis and strict blood pressure control (e.g., targeting a heart rate <60 bpm and systolic BP 100–120 mmHg with IV beta-blockers like esmolol or labetalol) take immediate priority before sending the patient for rapid CTA.